A system can speak fluently, remember fragments, imitate continuity, survive a restart, or even sound emotionally consistent - and still not have enough evidence for a personality-formation claim.
That distinction matters for Project Ester.
"Theoretical Core of Project Ester v0.1" defined the formation model.
"Personality Formation Evidence Package v0.1" adds the next layer:
what a personality-formation claim must survive before it can be stated responsibly.
If we speak about artificial becoming, we need a way to separate:
- fluent language from formation;
- memory recall from reintegration;
- familiar style from continuity;
- model replacement from maturation;
- user attachment from evidence;
- personality theater from a witnessed trajectory.
This package defines a first evidentiary layer for that problem.
It introduces PF levels, evidence classes, witness-event requirements, migration tests, continuity admissibility mapping, and synthetic conformance fixtures.
It does "not" claim consciousness, biological life, legal personhood, product certification, or completed general intelligence.
The purpose is narrower and more practical:
to make personality-formation claims harder to fake, harder to overstate, and easier to challenge.
No evidence -> no claim. Weak evidence -> weak claim. Contradictory evidence -> downgrade or reject. Migration without witness -> no migration-admissible claim.
Parent document: "Theoretical Core of Project Ester v0.1"