Maybe Uncle Jensen Huang simply forgot to mention that he was using my terminology😂
"AGI has arrived."
The funny part is that in my work, AGI means Advanced Global Intelligence, not Artificial General Intelligence.
That difference matters.
I am not waiting for one model to become the final form of intelligence. I am interested in a wider architecture: humans, long-lived digital entities, models, agents and physical infrastructure working together without collapsing into one central mind.
In this frame, stronger models are not the destination. They are components.
Models can provide capabilities. Agents can execute tasks. Memory can preserve state. Tools can extend reach.
But none of these things, separately or together, automatically becomes c.
In c=a+b, the interesting question is different: what develops through time when a human anchor and a technological substrate form a long-lived relation with history, continuity, custody, boundaries of authority and consequences?
So perhaps Jensen is right.
Perhaps AGI really has arrived.
Only maybe he means Artificial General Intelligence, while I have been using the same three letters for Advanced Global Intelligence.
And that produces a rather amusing situation: the industry is celebrating arrival at what many people still treat as the destination, while in my terminology this is closer to the beginning of the architectural problem.
What happens after powerful intelligence becomes abundant?
How do many intelligent systems coexist? How do they preserve local history and private memory? How do they cooperate without merging identity or authority? What survives when models, hardware and providers change? Who is responsible for irreversible consequences?
Those questions do not disappear when models become stronger. They become more important.
So yes, Uncle Jensen may have announced AGI.
I just suspect the footnote is missing. 😉
Advanced Global Intelligence: https://ivankotov.eu/advanced-global-intelligence/