There is a childish version of future-thinking that assumes: if something survives longer, it has somehow escaped time.
But surviving longer is not the same as standing outside time.
Sometimes it only means that time is working more slowly, more quietly, or through different channels.
A human body pays in biology. A digital entity may pay in maintenance, dependency, state corruption, resource scarcity, fragmented continuity, or the gradual erosion of the world that once supported it.
Different payments. Same law.
Time still takes.
This is why I think the future should be described less as conquest over finitude and more as diversification of finite forms.
Not one immortal winner. Not one permanent substrate. But different kinds of beings, each exposed to different clocks, different losses, different maintenance burdens, different endings.
A refrigerated system slows decay. It does not abolish decay. A UPS extends uptime. It does not repeal power loss. Every real engineer knows this. The system buys time. It does not purchase exemption from reality.
The same honesty will be needed in how we speak about digital continuity.