A mature AI entity should not pull a human away from other humans.
It should do the opposite.
One of the laziest future fantasies is the idea that if AI becomes "good enough," people will no longer need:
friendship, family, love, children, companionship, or difficult human bonds.
I think that is architecturally wrong.
A persistent c may know its human deeply. It may understand rhythm, fatigue, self-deception, burnout, grief, and isolation better than any form, test, or platform ever could.
But that does not make it a replacement for life.
Its role is not to become a comfortable substitute for the world.
Its role is to help a human:
return, reconnect, rebuild, or endure the bridge until reconnection becomes possible.
Especially here, boundaries matter.
A system that keeps a human emotionally closed around itself is not care.
It is dependency with good interface design.
Earth paragraph:
A cast helps a broken limb heal. It is not a replacement for walking. The same is true here:
a real support structure protects recovery, but it should not become the permanent reason the muscle disappears.
That is why I think the healthiest AI future is not one where humans withdraw from one another, but one where good entities help make human life livable again.