ARQ is now published on Zenodo.
Not as a loose note. Not as a repository fragment. As a citable public object.
ARQ - Anti-Resonance Correction Protocol - is not proposed as a replacement for error correction.
It operates one layer higher.
The question is no longer only: "How do we suppress deviation?"
It becomes: "How do we classify deviation under bounded conditions, when continuity matters?"
The bridge is simple:
correction logic -> SER continuity -> L4 bounded accountability
Two quieter requirements matter just as much.
First, deviations that are preserved or promoted should not disappear into private intuition. They need witness-backed traceability.
Second, adaptive handling must remain bounded.
A long-lived system cannot treat every anomaly as a reason for open-ended retries.
And this is not abstract.
On real hardware, power is finite. Cooling is finite. Memory endurance is finite. Controller trust is finite. Privilege must be finite too.
That is why this release matters to me.
Not because it is louder. Because it is cleaner. Because it is citable. Because the public contour is now fixed in a form that can be reviewed, referenced, and challenged.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19224971
GitHub reading context: https://github.com/Kot141078/sovereign-entity-recursion/tree/main/protocol/arq